The Okie Legacy: 1912, Democratic Purpose Is For Tariff Reform

Soaring eagle logo. Okie Legacy Banner. Click here for homepage.

Moderated by NW Okie!

Volume 18 , Issue 27

2016

Weekly eZine: (364 subscribers)
Subscribe | Unsubscribe
Using Desktop...

Sections
Alva Mystery
Opera House Mystery

Albums...
1920 Alva PowWow
1917 Ranger
1926 Ranger
1937 Ranger
Castle On the Hill

Stories Containing...

Blogs / WebCams / Photos
NW Okie's FB
OkieJournal FB
OkieLegacy Blog
Ancestry (paristimes)
NW Okie Instagram
Flickr Gallery
1960 Politcal Legacy
1933 WIRangeManuel
Volume 18
1999  Vol 1
2000  Vol 2
2001  Vol 3
2002  Vol 4
2003  Vol 5
2004  Vol 6
2005  Vol 7
2006  Vol 8
2007  Vol 9
2008  Vol 10
2009  Vol 11
2010  Vol 12
2011  Vol 13
2012  Vol 14
2013  Vol 15
2014  Vol 16
2015  Vol 17
2016  Vol 18
2017  Vol 19
2018  Vol 20
2021  Vol 21
Issues 27
Iss 1  1-4 
Iss 2  1-11 
Iss 3  1-18 
Iss 4  1-25 
Iss 5  2-1 
Iss 6  2-8 
Iss 7  2-15 
Iss 8  2-22 
Iss 9  2-29 
Iss 10  3-7 
Iss 11  3-14 
Iss 12  3-21 
Iss 13  3-28 
Iss 14  4-5 
Iss 15  4-11 
Iss 16  4-19 
Iss 17  4-26 
Iss 18  5-2 
Iss 19  5-9 
Iss 20  5-16 
Iss 21  5-30 
Iss 22  6-6 
Iss 23  6-13 
Iss 24  6-19 
Iss 25  6-27 
Iss 26  7-4 
Iss 27  7-18 
Iss 28  7-28 
Iss 29  8-4 
Iss 30  8-12 
Iss 31  8-22 
Iss 32  8-29 
Iss 33  9-5 
Iss 34  9-13 
Iss 35  9-21 
Iss 36  10-4 
Iss 37  10-13 
Iss 38  10-20 
Iss 39  10-28 
Iss 40  11-5 
Iss 41  11-12 
Iss 42  11-21 
Iss 43  11-28 
Iss 44  12-8 
Iss 45  12-18 
Other Resources
NWOkie JukeBox

1912, Democratic Purpose Is For Tariff Reform

Back in the 1912 Presidential election, this is what the Salina, Kansas newspaper, The Saline Daily Union, dated 21 September 1912, Saturday, page 1: "Democratic Purpose Is For Tariff Reform."

Found on Newspapers.com

The Democratic party had a consistent record against high taxation of property. They believed that government should not levy taxes against one citizen for the benefit of another under pretense of protecting industry.

Why should farmers pay taxes to help harvester Trust? The Great majority of American citizens were engaged in work of such a nature that protective duties must always be a tax,never a benefit. Wilson had pledged to lower cost of living.

New York, Sept. 21 -- Tariff reform was the one great issue of this campaign. The following remarkable article on the tariff was by Savoyard who had been a leading democratic writer on this subject for many years:

Governor Marshall, the democratic candidate for vice president, is convince that it is bad husbandry and perhaps bad morals, for the government to engage in the favoritism of equalizing the cost of production at home and abroad for the manufacturers before it equalizes the difference in the purchase prices to the consumer at home and abroad. That was antiquated doctrine, preached by Thomas Jefferson,a nd practiced by Andrew Jackson, that William h. Taft repudiates and Theodore Roosevelt rejects. It meant that the government should not lay taxes on one citizen. It meant that if one individual was entitled to protection, all individuals had equal rights to enjoy it.

But Mr. Taft and Mr. Roosevelt both held that it was sound economy to tax the consumers of the United States in order that certain interests would engage in enterprises that would be unprofitable if the government did not enforce the common people to protect them. There was the real paramount issue of this campaign - should Peter, a hardworking farmer, pay higher prices for what e was bound to have in order to enrich Paul, a manufacturer who made clothing and other fabrics of wool and cotton, and all farm machinery, such as is turned out by the Harvester trust, - reapers, mowers, threshers, plows, rakes hoes and what not? It is the simplest proposition in the world - should taxation be for public purpose or for private gain?

Millions of fellow citizens were engaged in walks that deprived them of any benefit arising from a protective tariff. It was impossible to protect him in a tariff law. He was the victim of that policy; he paid the protection in the higher cost of living. That was the main cause of clashes between employer and employee, of strikes and violence such as were seen at Lawrence, Mass., some time ago. Wages were high, but the advantage of them was swallowed up in the higher cost of living.

The question back then was, do the people wish to continue that sort of thing. Both Taft and Roosevelt said we must have a protective tariff though they were reasonable enough to admit that there is too much protection in the present tariff. Who was to judge just how much protection a tariff should have" Taft and Roosevelt said a commission must be appointed to that labor. WE have had on commission of that order, appointed the first year of Raft's administration. At a cost of thousands of dollars it gathered data, pretended to digest them, made report, and the ablest men in both houses of congress declared that after careful study they did not know what the report means. And where men do pretend to understand it, they were not at all agreed on what it imports.

The question for the country back in 1912 was, "How can the country hope for a tariff reform from either Taft or Roosevelt? It will take years for the commission to report and both Taft and Roosevelt said that there can be no satisfactory reform of the tariff without such a report. Both refused to surrender the dogma of protection and as long as we had a protective tariff the manufacturers would find a way to dictate it. They would have their agents in both houses of congress, the smartest fellows there - such men as Aldrich. They would attend to the job in the future as they had in the past if the tariff is to continue protective.

Roosevelt, was president from September 1901, till March 1909. He solemnly promised to carry out the McKinley policies. McKinley's last public utterance was a plea for tariff revision downward. For seven and one-half years Roosevelt let the tariff severely alone. Is he the man to set to the revising of the tariff?

Taft would not allow the Sixty-second congress to reform the tariff. He ws the first president to veto a tariff measure and his excuse was that the bills of the democrats and the insurgent republicans took to much of the protection off the Payne Aldrich law.

Back in 1912, if the country wanted tariff reform, it must seek it at the hands of Woodrow Wilson and a congress democratic in both houses.
  |  View or Add Comments (0 Comments)   |   Receive updates ( subscribers)  |   Unsubscribe


© . Linda Mcgill Wagner - began © 1999 Contact Me